User talk:Dick Laurent: difference between revisions

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search
(bear)
(Final Warning: new section)
Line 96: Line 96:
   
 
:::::: Haha only thing I'd change is 'likes cock' to 'smokes pole'. — <font face="Lucida console"><small>['''[[User:Dick Laurent|Ric]]''' [[User talk:Dick Laurent|Laurent]]]</small></font> — 19:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 
:::::: Haha only thing I'd change is 'likes cock' to 'smokes pole'. — <font face="Lucida console"><small>['''[[User:Dick Laurent|Ric]]''' [[User talk:Dick Laurent|Laurent]]]</small></font> — 19:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Final Warning ==
  +
  +
If you do not cease and desist your derogatory comments toward me, and halt all communication, both direct and indirect; in person, online, through online postings, over the phone, through e-mail or by any other means immediately. You will have to explain yourself [http://www.cc-courthelp.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.viewPage&pageID=2176&stopRedirect=1 here]. I want no contact from you.[[User:Gtroy|Gtroy]] 17:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:46, 28 September 2011

Be warned. If you bite, I bite back.

Anything is possible if you don't know what the bloody hell you're talking about.

I IZ SERIUS ADMNIM THIZ IZ SERIUS BIZNIS lolcat.jpg
Archive 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011


poz

Hi, Dick. You're familiar with sexual terms; have you heard this used as a noun, in the singular, like "his partner was a poz"? Searching Usenet, I can only find it as an adjective ("he was poz", "a poz boy", "a poz partner") or as "pozzies" (which could be a plurale tantum). - -sche (discuss) 02:18, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

I can't say I have, I've seen it used as an adjective both predicatively and attributively, but I can't recall ever seeing it used as a noun. I've gotta say, I think I like being the guy know is familiar with sexual terms :D — [Ric Laurent] — 10:38, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

move talk away from the nice newbie's page

I have to say, there have been times I thought this user was you fucking with me. Some of his entries are definitely worth having, I just wish he'd put a little more effort into... something I can't put into words, or that I'd rather not because I've been enough of a dick in general today. Maybe I'll save it for tomorrow. — [Ric Laurent] — 21:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Admittedly, I probably am a reason that there's animosity to new users, as most of the good ones are actually me. Anyway, thanks for backing off. I think we as a community can benefit muchly from having this new guy around, just we gotta b patient or something. As for fucking with you, it is indeed true that I love fucking with you just as you love fucking with certain people, but this particular fucker is not one of mine. Anyway, I look forward to seeing the dickish things you do tomorrow, Ric. --Rockpilot 21:17, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Honestly I've had a soft spot for you ever since you ran Keenebot for Romanian entries. Not many around here give half a fuck about Romanian, so I never thought that kind of stuff would get done... It made me pretty happy.
Anyway, with this new guy I tried to patiently tell him he's gotta work with the people who tell him he's editing poorly or whatever complaints they have... I tried to be cool about it while not letting him get away with too much, but I'm pretty sure he didn't want to listen before he started reading, so I never got anywhere - which irritated me to the point that I stopped trying to be civil. It's frustrating to see someone who could potentially add a lot of useful stuff be so unwilling to make an effort to improve their editing until you threaten to ban them. Then you do that, and they get even more defensive... It's shitty. — [Ric Laurent] — 21:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Come on, dude, he's been here less than a week. There's plenty of users to help him out. After a week you were producing stuff like this, and swearing a hell of a lot. --Rockpilot 22:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, I think about that from time to time, but in my defense back then we didn't really have a set format for hiragana entries, and nobody was telling me it was wrong. I always based my entries on stuff I saw elsewhere. — [Ric Laurent] — 22:23, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
To be honest, I think I've been not critical enough of Gtroy, as I dislike conflict (but I do it anyway, as you've all noticed!). The problem with Gtroy is his unwillingness to listen to others, it doesn't matter if a million users want to help him if he's willing to ignore all of them. --Mglovesfun (talk) 22:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
I think he's the kind of person that no amount of criticism positive or otherwise will sway him. He's... stubborn. And I would argue not the brightest star in the sky. — [Ric Laurent] — 22:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Whose the most diplomatic user around here anyway? Conrad.Irwin (talkcontribs) was very good at dealing with users. SB can be too. Dvortygirl was good too. Needless to say, us 3 are probably the worst welcome commitee possible - Ric's got a hideously dirty tongue and bites back like a very bitey thing, Gloves has incredibly poor logical reasoning skills and is naive about human interaction, and I just waffle on and on. --Rockpilot 22:42, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
I do ok with less uptight people, and people who aren't argumentative. I'm ok at watching my mouth up to a certain point... but after that you're pretty right. I'm a bit of a loose cannon.
I'd say Stephen would probably be the most diplomatic. He's certainly one of the smartest and doesn't waste time in arguments. But he tends to focus his attention on more meaningful endeavors than greeting and guiding foolish newBz. Most of our people with reasonable amounts of self-control are like that. — [Ric Laurent] — 22:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Logomaniac was very diplomatic and also tried to help newbies, but was also naive.​—msh210 (talk) 23:35, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, but she was 13. I guess by now she's 14. — [Ric Laurent] — 23:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
I imagine that trying-to-help-newbies and naïveté are positively correlated. ;-)   —RuakhTALK 20:06, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Yeah but the fact that there's an obvious and self-professed Wonderfool does not mean that nobody else can possibly be him :) Equinox 22:46, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

MTV generation

Watching MTV is how people get The Gay. Nobody was gay before that Dire Straits video about the removal men. Except Oscar Wilde. Ummm, he was "genetic". Equinox 00:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

I got The Gay from watching the Wizard of Oz too many times a day. That Judy Garland... damn her shiny red shoes. Damn them.
I would've been genetic for Alfred Douglas, too. That face was made for receiving semen. — [Ric Laurent] — 00:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
I am pretty sure that a combination of my daycare being next to an army reserve center with hot half naked muscle men and the packaging on men's underwear is what made me gay!Gtroy 11:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
God I used to love underwear packaging.... I just didn't know why til I was 12. — [Ric Laurent] — 11:44, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Is Equinox gay? A question for purely lexicographical reasons, mind. --Rockpilot 11:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Haha :D Not to my knowledge or belief, no. Seems like tons around here are, though. — [Ric Laurent] — 11:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Should change the name to "Welikediktionary" or something. --Rockpilot 11:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Why would anyone ever want to ban you? Lol — [Ric Laurent] — 11:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm glad we had this conversation. I think all of us are happier as a result. You and Roy have found some common ground, I've found out about some others' sexual preferences, we've got a new name, so now back to work. --Rockpilot 12:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
I sorta had a feeling Troy might like wang when we immediately didn't get along. I've always gotten along with straight guys better, and nobody is cattier or bitchier than us queerz. — [Ric Laurent] — 12:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Hahaha. I just came back here and read all of this. No, I'm not gay. (Ric turned me straight. ba-dum ching!) Equinox 20:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Zinggggggggggg lol — [Ric Laurent] — 20:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

From Grumpy

Hiya, Aap Kaise Hain? I'm going to try to learn the dev naagri skript on here, and then I'll post something rude in Sanskrit. AaronCarson 00:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Typing in Nagari is friggin difficult, I've been fumbling with google translate to do it recently. — [Ric Laurent] — 01:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Just so you know, google is fucking useless. I'll try to find you something better. AaronCarson 01:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
It's pretty decent for some languages, but for Indian languages yea pretty useless... with Hindi I mostly just use it for typing in Devnagri. For translations, I usually bug Anatoli and Dijan, who I'm sure you'll run across here eventually lol. — [Ric Laurent]
You can also try Google transliteration (many languages are listed). If the conversion doesn't work for you and you want specific symbols, you can use the keyboard provided (search for the button). Google Translate allows the same thing. Another one with Devanagari keybord: Shabdkosh dictionary. --Anatoli 01:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Google translate and transliteration tool also gave me grief when I tried to type शहरज़ाद (śahrzād) (Scheherazade), I would get शहरजाद (śahrjād) instead, the nuqtā just wouldn't appear. I prefer to use it, especially with foreign names. My Hindi is very basic, I still learn occasionally, though. --Anatoli 01:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
^ This is Anatoli, he's awesome, and a million percent more modest than I am :D
Yeah, Google translate's phonetic typing kinda blows sometimes. I wonder when my linguistic wanderlust will drag me back to Hindi.... — [Ric Laurent] — 01:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

bear

Hi, could you add a usex to the gay slang use of bear, please. And twink and gloryholer if you fancy --Rockpilot 18:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Absolutely lol — [Ric Laurent] — 18:41, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
LOL, they're beautiful. I attempted some usexes myself, but before pressing "Save" I though to myself, "I doubt any gay person would use the word like this." So maybe I'll go to a gay bar sometime to find out how you guys actually speak. --Rockpilot 19:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
That's right, all you gay people speak the same! BTW, is there a derogatory word for a straight guy who pretends to be gay, but obviously isn't, and he just looks like a giant douche? --Rockpilot 19:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Hmm, I dunno... I know we have breeder, but I don't think most of us are clever enough to come up with something good enough to describe that specifically... though it would be excellent if we did. — [Ric Laurent] — 19:06, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
How's this usex: Since the breeders started coming here, you can never tell who likes cock.
Haha only thing I'd change is 'likes cock' to 'smokes pole'. — [Ric Laurent] — 19:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Final Warning

If you do not cease and desist your derogatory comments toward me, and halt all communication, both direct and indirect; in person, online, through online postings, over the phone, through e-mail or by any other means immediately. You will have to explain yourself here. I want no contact from you.Gtroy 17:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)