User talk:Zeggazo: difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Romanophile (talk | contribs) |
Dan Polansky (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
: Polansky, for the love of God, please shut up. --[[User:Romanophile|Romanophile]] ([[User talk:Romanophile|talk]]) 15:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC) |
: Polansky, for the love of God, please shut up. --[[User:Romanophile|Romanophile]] ([[User talk:Romanophile|talk]]) 15:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
:: Said a resident troll Romanophile AKA Pilcrow AKA Æ&Œ, with unimpressive mainspace contribution, noted e.g. for the creation of {{temp|suffix}}, having trolled some of the most productive editors here including SemperBlotto and Equinox. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|talk]]) 10:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:58, 5 October 2014
Pass a Method
Are you User:Pass a Method aka User:North Atlanticist Usonian? --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Attestation and pocketpussy
You have created pocketpussy. This does not seem attested per WT:ATTEST. Please only create attested entries. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- i cited it. Zeggazo (talk) 07:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- I cannot find the quotations that you have posted online. Can you post links to them? --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well, is that really necessary? Whenever i click on a google group link it can be problematic due to my usual inclination to find 3 references; this becomes difficult if i press the back button but due to recoil i end up on a different line to the one i was on before i clicked on the google group thread. Plus i have the feeling you're being lazy. There are 73 thread results so it cant be that difficult to find. Zeggazo (talk) 09:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- I have to be able to verify the citations, especially since as User:Pass a Method you have a track record of not checking carefully enough when entering citations. E.g. the first citation you have entered says "Is that like a pocketpussy or what?" I cannot extract the meaning of the term from the citation alone, so I would like to see the context of the citatation. I search google:"Is that like a pocketpussy or what?" and it finds nothing, suggesting the citation has been wrongly transcribed or something is wrong with Google search. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Zeggazo (talk) 10:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- I have to be able to verify the citations, especially since as User:Pass a Method you have a track record of not checking carefully enough when entering citations. E.g. the first citation you have entered says "Is that like a pocketpussy or what?" I cannot extract the meaning of the term from the citation alone, so I would like to see the context of the citatation. I search google:"Is that like a pocketpussy or what?" and it finds nothing, suggesting the citation has been wrongly transcribed or something is wrong with Google search. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well, is that really necessary? Whenever i click on a google group link it can be problematic due to my usual inclination to find 3 references; this becomes difficult if i press the back button but due to recoil i end up on a different line to the one i was on before i clicked on the google group thread. Plus i have the feeling you're being lazy. There are 73 thread results so it cant be that difficult to find. Zeggazo (talk) 09:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Blockable behavior
You should be blocked for repeated wasting of editor time despite repeated explanation over an extended period of time. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Take a deep breath and hold for 15 seconds, allow the oxygen to flow through the cerebral artery towards the brain; and exhale and I promise you'll feel much better. Zeggazo (talk) 10:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Polansky, for the love of God, please shut up. --Romanophile (talk) 15:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Said a resident troll Romanophile AKA Pilcrow AKA Æ&Œ, with unimpressive mainspace contribution, noted e.g. for the creation of
{{suffix}}
, having trolled some of the most productive editors here including SemperBlotto and Equinox. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Said a resident troll Romanophile AKA Pilcrow AKA Æ&Œ, with unimpressive mainspace contribution, noted e.g. for the creation of