Reconstruction talk:Proto-Slavic/otъ

Voicing of the final consonant was probably due to assimilation in word sandhi. Once the jers were lost, it became so prevalent that it was taken as the "normal" form, with ot only preserved in old derivations. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

The final *t is more likely to have been replaced with *d by analogy with *nadъ, *perdъ, *podъ, *vъslědъ, etc. --124.148.104.29 08:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Possibly, but iz is already a precedent for such development. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 22:03, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

I have added father

As it is linked to from both ojciec and Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/átta.

Please review the declension etc. as I am not an expert.

Zezen (talk) 17:49, 1 August 2021 (UTC)