Talk:A2600

RFV discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Searching google books:"A2600" +atari only shows (deprecated template usage) a2600 used as part of a web address, viz. http://www.zophar.net/a2600.html.  — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 13:41, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Should we have this kind of designation anyway? There are zillions of them, and they are pretty much brand names. A1200, CBM64 and CPC464 all spring to mind within a few seconds. Equinox ◑ 19:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Really should be in RFD. I don't think it should pass there though.--Dmol 10:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. If anyone had cited it, an RFD might have become necessary, but no one did, so it's moot. —Ruakh_TALK 21:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)