RFV discussion [ edit ]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Just found this while updating some templates. I wasn't sure to rfd, rfv or rfc it, so I brought it here. Which of our criteria does this meet, if any?
Mglovesfun ( talk) 14:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
None - it should be the
Fab Four. SemperBlotto
If one does, the other probably does too, right?
Mglovesfun ( talk) 14:58, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Cited. Equinox ◑ 15:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Hang on, I'd compare it to
Spidey, an informal nickname for a specific entry. Do these entries meet our criteria simply by being attestable? If yes, great, no complaints from me. Mglovesfun ( talk) 15:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Reminds me of the recent
Wiktionary:Requests_for_deletion#iTouch; similar terms include , Ab Fab , Apop , and Mickey D . However, since this has been brought to RFV, it only needs attestation, and I've shown that it is actually used. Codies Equinox ◑ 15:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Mglovesfun ( talk) 11:02, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Cited and kept. Anyone objecting to its inclusion, rather than its attestability, should open a new RFD. Equinox ◑ 17:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)