Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
It's used in this ad. It's funny, but does it fulfill our criteria? As far as I can tell, it looks like an ad for a TV show. There should be some independent use, shouldn't there? --Hekaheka (talk) 05:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
I've never heard of it. It is fairly common for ads to invent words like these. --WikiTiki89 06:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Speedied. Obvious protologism (I would bet the ad campaign is less than a year old, which would further clinch it), and nothing in Books or Groups but typos/scannos for magnesia and amnesia. In addition, capitalization was wrong, and a second definition line was added explaining its origin, which should have been in an etymology section. If it somehow enters the lexicon and lasts for a year, it can be added back with citations meeting CFI under the correct capitalization and with a better definition. Until then- it's gone. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)