This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive.
Tagged, not added here. —CodeCat 18:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Was tagged by a Wonderfool sockpuppet which was indefinitely blocked before he could list it here. The thing is, it claims to be a common noun and a former trademark, so WT:BRAND wouldn't apply. Ergo, keep for lack of any reason to delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Seems reasonable. Keep.DAVilla 05:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Keep in the absence of deletion rationale. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Move to RFV for citations meeting WT:BRAND. The trademark may have expired, but that doesn't mean it's necessarily become a generic term in English. Equinox◑ 13:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Closed. No consensus to delete. bd2412T 14:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC)