It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Name of one specific Web site; Wikipedia material. Compare MySpace (go and read that one carefully), which is (supposedly) a generic term: we do not define it as the specific MySpace.com Web site. Equinox◑ 20:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Well, this opens up a problem: why do we keep Wiktionary? --Yair rand 20:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Because we are Wiktionary and someone was bound to end up adding it. Wiki terms seem to get some kind of exemption because most of our users like them (see Category:WMF jargon). A more neutral example would be better, e.g. Amazon (the online bookseller — not in our entry). Equinox◑ 23:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. Delete. Tooironic 04:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
RFV of the proper noun section. It needs citations that pass BRAND, or it needs to be re-deleted (it previously failed RFD, but was recreated). Note that the verb is presumably both attested and valid (wrt BRAND). - -sche(discuss) 07:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)