Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
There are books and scholar hits for this, but rare enough (and some of them use the with-h in the same publication, showing it's a typo) that I think it can be considered a not-common-enough-for-inclusion misspelling.—msh210℠ 18:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)