Talk:bawbels
Cleanup debate[edit]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This is redirected from bawbles which should instead have its own page. Also, there are two definitions here, which should be split. Also, they should have quotations. Also, this looks like a simple plural; if it is, then either the definition or the etymology should indicate as much.—msh210℠ 18:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- which in turn is a misspelling of baubels (singular baubel) --BigBadBen 21:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Currently at RFV, where it looks like failing. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Verification debate[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Only hits are [ in other dictionaries] --Volants 13:43, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted. Google Books and Scholar only list other dictionaries. Google Groups hits are errors for (deprecated template usage) baubels. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)