Talk:collect up
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RFD[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Tagged but not listed. As for why, I have no idea. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Without looking at the history, I'm fairly sure that it was tagged because in this case (and in many cases) up is just a verb-modifying intensifier that does not otherwise alter the meaning of the verb modified. I'm fairly sure that it wasn't listed because this page has been full of nominations. DCDuring TALK 20:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Same's true for wake up mind you. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- It's probably also true for quite a few of the 471 terms in Category:English phrasal verbs with particle (up). Chuck Entz (talk) 23:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- However, only certain verbs do this, e.g. we have collect up and gather up but not amass up or acquire up. Equinox ◑ 23:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- It's probably also true for quite a few of the 471 terms in Category:English phrasal verbs with particle (up). Chuck Entz (talk) 23:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Same's true for wake up mind you. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Don't understand rationale either. Wake up is the best counterargument so far though. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Kept. No consensus to delete.--Jusjih (talk) 05:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)