Talk:complex systems
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RFV discussion[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense X 2. From Category:Systems theory, which may have more worth review. DCDuring TALK 00:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- To clarify, there is no doubt that the collocation exists. The issue is whether each of the longish definitions given is supported by three citations in every detail. The definitions given arguably have half a dozen features each. As is common in such cases, what we have seems to amount to two prescriptive definitions of related concepts each used by one author or possibly a group of authors probably as paraphrases interpreted by our contributor(s). Whether attestable definitions are not SoP is an open question. It could only be seen once they were attested. There might well be a good shorter attestable non-SoP definition to be added, possibly more than one. DCDuring TALK 10:51, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Also the singular is questionable: "complex system: specific kind of system, which a certain complexity". --Hekaheka 12:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
RFV failed, senses removed. —RuakhTALK 01:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)