Talk:exceptio ordinis seu excussionis

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


And related terms. L2 headers. Ety development among RTs, formatting. DCDuring TALK 09:49, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How translingual is this? Mglovesfun (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Something very much like it appears in a few German, French, Italian, and Spanish books about law. It may be that quite a few of the Legal Latin expressions that we have are actually Translingual, though not necessarily in the exact senses we have. We should have no problems tapping our vast cadre of lawyer-contributors for this. DCDuring TALK 17:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But "something like" isn't the same term. Unless we can say it shows up across a very large number of languages, then it should be listed individually by language. I've made the entry "English" for now, and have somewhat cleaned up the etymology. --EncycloPetey 04:02, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That seems to be a singular and burdensome interpretation. This particular term an its alternative forms seems to be part of the civil law tradition, which is to say, the legal tradition that shaped law in most parts of Europe. I personally don't care enough to reform this and certainly not to cite in multiple languages. But, Translingual seems the appropriate default for terms from Roman Law that have entered the civil law tradition. Such terms appear in Dutch, German, French, Italian, and Spanish works. DCDuring TALK 11:09, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


RFV discussion: February–July 2021[edit]

See Talk:exceptio beneficium excussionis#RFV discussion: February–July 2021.