Talk:freeware
This term is probably older than Usenet but here's the earliest post I can find on Google Groups:
- freeware: net.micro.pc - 15 Feb 1983 by INFO-PC@USC-ISIB: [1]
- freewares: comp.sys.sun - 2 Apr 1988 by William LeFebvre: [2]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense "free software". If we ignore this challenged sense, then freeware is "Complete and functional software that does not require payment or other compensation (and) may be a proprietary license with no access to the source code", while free software is either 1. "Software that can be freely copied, redistributed and modified, including source code; software that is libre" or 2. "Any software that is free of charge, such as freeware." The challenged sense is evidently saying that freeware can be sense 1 of free software (i.e. open and modifiable); I dispute this (even if freeware can coincidentally also be open and modifiable, that's not what it means); please cite. Equinox ◑ 19:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- Fully agreed. A frequent confusion at most. See top warning on w:Free software: "Not to be confused with freeware or open-source software". Free software adepts have been struggling for a long time to make the difference clear to everyone. — Xavier, 00:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 06:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)