The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, though feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Is there an idiomatic sense missing from this entry? DTLHS (talk) 09:51, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Single word (almost) would seem to have a much lower bar for idiomaticity. DAVilla 13:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Probably a single word, no? Keep. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Citations and an entry at houseproud would settle this, wouldn't it? DCDuring TALK 16:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks to Equinox for citing houseproud. Thus house proud and house-proud can only be RfVed, not RfDed under WT:COALMINE. Kept DCDuring TALK 01:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC)