Talk:lytty

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page is useful as REDIRECT, because Finnish adverbs lytyssä and lyttyyn look like they were inessive and illative forms of a (non-existing) noun or adjective lytty. A user familiar with Finnish grammar might thus want to know what lytty means. Explanatory usage notes will be written to the entries for lytyssä and lyttyyn. --Hekaheka 17:08, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for deletion[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


See talk:lytty, a redirect for a word that does not exist, and maybe never did. Surely this violates all sorts of Wiktionary policies. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize that adding it was such a horrible crime. I added it because I have explained many Finnish peculiarities to a user that tries to learn Finnish in Wiktionary:Requested_entries:Finnish, and he thought it might be useful for people like him. But by all means, go ahead. On a second thought, the usage note in the entry lytyssä does the same thing just fine. --Hekaheka 17:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well clearly it's not a horrible crime, but your own analysis seems pretty good. It would be like having talenting redirect to talented because talent is not a verb. Also, on the talk page you seem to think it could redirect to more than one page, which is currently impossible. But it's just a word on a website, don't lose sleep over it (smile). Mglovesfun (talk) 20:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All right, I wasn't going to. Why don't we just speedy it? Nobody ever wanted to say it exists. --Hekaheka 21:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Since you seem okay with this, I have deleted it. There might be a better approach to this kind of thing (people looking up "plausible" words that don't exist), but we'd have to decide on a standard way of doing it. Equinox 00:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]