Can someone add sample sentences (or better yet, cites) to demonstrate the difference between English verb senses 1 and 2? Right now 1 looks to me like a subset of 2, with no special meaning intended. —RuakhTALK 13:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
English verb sense #1. It seems to be a subset of sense #2. (This might actually be a matter for RFV, if someone can find cites where the sense is #1 to the exclusion of #2, like "He didn't create the cabin, he just made it.") —RuakhTALK 22:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I can't think of any example sentence to distinguish the two. --EncycloPetey 22:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Leonardo de Vinci created many fanciful contraptions, but what did he ever make? DAVilla 18:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
An administrator hitting a delete button isn't the way to address the aforementioned concerns. Don't bring cleanup to Requests for deletion. Uncle G 13:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I am probably wrong, but doesn't sense 1. include To make a model airplane following the instructions.? The item is already created, and you are just putting the pieces together. Algrif 17:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Rfd-sense (linguistics) "to form", which is just a specific example of the following more general sense "to constitute". For example, in the sentence Words form a sentence. one can equally correctly say Words constitute a sentence. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 21:11, 6 July 2013 (UTC)