Talk:no biggie
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Is there any reason to have this when there is biggie/biggy? --Hekaheka 06:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
No, redirect at best.Mglovesfun (talk) 17:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)- Having said that, no problem, no worries and no sweat all have entries. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:28, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- And no probs. I think all of these are idiomatic. At the very least, they would belong in a comprehensive colloquial phrasebook. They are elliptical and one cannot readily substitute synonyms without labeling oneself non-native. keep. DCDuring TALK 13:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed, keep per above. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- And no probs. I think all of these are idiomatic. At the very least, they would belong in a comprehensive colloquial phrasebook. They are elliptical and one cannot readily substitute synonyms without labeling oneself non-native. keep. DCDuring TALK 13:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Having said that, no problem, no worries and no sweat all have entries. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:28, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept.—msh210℠ 22:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)