Talk:reference point

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

There seems to be an almost identical entry point of reference. I don't know enough about wikitionary to no what to do in these situations. --82.138.219.137 09:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFD debate[edit]

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

defined as point of reference. Perhaps point of reference is idiomatic, but this? DCDuring TALK 18:16, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as an alternative form (not spelling) of point of reference. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Even alternative-form entries are supposed to meet WT:CFI. If you think they should have a lesser standard, it might be part of a CFI reform proposal. DCDuring TALK 22:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like each is iff the other is.​—msh210℠ 22:53, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm saying it meets CFI, Mglovesfun (talk) 20:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kept as no consensus. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:reference_point&oldid=31617155"