Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
Not sure what to make of this... —CodeCat 17:32, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Absolute tosh. I would have just deleted it. All the quotes are typos for romantic. The definition points to the term ronance which also does not exist. SemperBlotto (talk) 17:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Gone, obvious hoax, interwikis were all bogus copied and pasted from romantic changed the 'm' to an 'n'. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:01, 20 December 2012 (UTC)