Talk:ruthless

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I thought ruthless meant "willing to do whatever it takes to succeed, no matter what gets in the way." — This unsigned comment was added by 220.235.156.48 (talk).

Not exactly, it just means ‘without mercy or compassion’. Widsith 08:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ruthless[edit]

So if Ruthless is no so good what is Ruth, and what is the history or roots of the word? — This unsigned comment was added by 137.91.114.239 (talk).

ruth means pity, compassion, regret. It's related to rue, as in "you'll rue the day". Widsith 14:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for verification[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense: (Of a problem etc) Difficult to solve. - never seen it personally, no evidence in my usual suspects references. - Amgine/talk 23:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two "ruthless problems" in Google Books: "The antitax phenomenon is an increasingly ruthless problem for schools"; "it appeared to him that the still more ruthless problem of £ sd awaited". On second thoughts, it might not mean "difficult to solve" here, but "unforgiving" (as though the problem has been anthropomorphised and made "ruthless" in the normal sense). Equinox 00:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think your second thought is right. The two problems described as ruthless seem not only difficult but impossible to solve and thus "without pity or compassion; cruel, pitiless". Delete sense. --Hekaheka 00:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFV failed, sense removed. —RuakhTALK 01:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]