Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

Only the stare one seems remotely real - and have so acted. The "missile man" backwards use for definitions is "right out" as that def itself seems a major leap for a single usage. Collect (talk) 09:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


TK archive icon.svg

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, though feel free to discuss its conclusions.

I'm pretty sure that the meaning is much more general than the one given. SemperBlotto (talk) 18:41, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

This entry was created by IP user Special:Contributions/, whose contrib list makes them look very much like the latest IP reassignment for our magic-obsessed Japanophile user. If so, this user is known for a high volume of edits, and a generally low level of lexicographic skill. (I cringe in anticipation of the ensuing crapflood of poor-quality work that will need to be sorted through and cleaned up.) -- Eiríkr ÚtlendiTala við mig 20:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
But steely-eyed missile man isn't one of his (or hers). Mglovesfun (talk) 20:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

The one supportable def remains (strong stare) - the "missile man" seems to have been a massive leap, for sure, so the ones derived backwards from it seemed eminently removeable. Collect (talk) 09:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

{{look}} This will fail RFV and be deleted if citations are not provided that show how the term is used. - -sche (discuss) 00:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Um, the whole entry? This is a widely used phrase and the one remaining definition seems spot on to me. It is easily citable, see this gbooks search. SpinningSpark 14:41, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
I'd have thought it would fail RFD as obvious from its parts (see steely; compare furious-eyed, large-eyed, etc.). We do have blue-eyed and green-eyed, though, so perhaps someone thinks these are useful. Equinox 14:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
@Spinningspark: wow; I don't recall ever hearing the term before, but the search you link to shows that it is quite common.
@Equinox: if you'd like to move it to RFD, be my guest. - -sche (discuss) 05:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)