Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
In Australia "train station" --Volants 17:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Plausible but RFV failed. I could only find a couple of not-very-usable posts on Usenet. Equinox◑ 23:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Equinox has removed the sense. I see only one Usenet and one Books hit (both of which I've added to the cites page); if there's another Usenet hit, I'm not seeing it, but that might suffice then.—msh210℠ (talk) 17:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Someone has restored the sense, because there are three citations on the citations page, but I don't think the 2003 one is at all clear. - -sche(discuss) 06:24, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
RFV-failed (again), with only two intelligible citations. - -sche(discuss) 19:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)