Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so. See Wiktionary’s criteria for inclusion.
Previously tagged for speedy deletion but brought in here as it seems that the mentioned equipment does exist , . Any opinions? --Tohru 02:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
I apologise, I was the one who tagged it for speedy deletion, as it was added on the heels of 'Jesusstick' and a few other nonsense entries. Noting these sources , it seems to meet our criteria for inclusion. Do keep it. Beobach972 04:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Not sure if this request has been withdrawn. Cited nonetheless. DAVilla 06:43, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
RfVpassed (or withdrawn ;-) may be a very recent term but as it is used in serious technical literature ... Robert Ullmann 20:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
It really is too bad it isn't tunameter though ... Robert Ullmann 20:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)