Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Previously tagged for speedy deletion but brought in here as it seems that the mentioned equipment does exist , . Any opinions? --Tohru 02:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
I apologise, I was the one who tagged it for speedy deletion, as it was added on the heels of 'Jesusstick' and a few other nonsense entries. Noting these sources , it seems to meet our criteria for inclusion. Do keep it. Beobach972 04:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Not sure if this request has been withdrawn. Cited nonetheless. DAVilla 06:43, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
RfVpassed (or withdrawn ;-) may be a very recent term but as it is used in serious technical literature ... Robert Ullmann 20:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
It really is too bad it isn't tunameter though ... Robert Ullmann 20:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)