Talk:wanweirdit
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RFV discussion[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Scots. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:24, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Scots requires 3 citations, as per Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion/Well documented languages and WT:CFI#Number_of_citations. There is only one citation on the wanweirdit page. This suggests "RFV failed" is imminent. Searches: google books:"wanweirdit", google groups:"wanweirdit", “wanweirdit”, in OneLook Dictionary Search.. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:43, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Failed RfV, deleted. bd2412 T 15:10, 27 April 2014 (UTC)