This weird comma is by design? --Ivan Štambuk 11:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- When I first created this template, anagrams were arranged one per line and this template displayed as:
- alphagram: dorw
- several iterations later, and anagrams are displayed differently and the alphagram is not displayed if it is not a word (which I think is wrong, but don't care about it enough to argue) and is not labelled even when it is. I suspect the comma is left over from some intermediate version, but I'm not certain. Conrad.Irwin is the person whose done all the complex things here, and he runs the bot that maintains anagrams, so you'd probably get a better answer from him. —This unsigned comment was added by Thryduulf (talk • contribs) at 14:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC).
(As in subst + able, not sub- + table) was trying to make this substable as I suspect it's not going to be used again; I've asked Conrad.Irwin but he hasn't yet replied (he's quite busy). I feel like what I've done ought to work, but it doesn't. At the very least, it shouldn't do what it is doing now! Mglovesfun (talk) 10:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, the current version is not making any sense to me. If the alphagram is not a valid word, nothing is printed, which in turn makes the documentation all but incomprehensible. 220.127.116.11 04:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)