Template talk:rfd
Definition from Wiktionary, a free dictionary
Contents |
[edit] Documentation
[edit] Usage notes
- Add {{rfd|short reason here}} to the top of the page.
- Click on the (+) to add the page to Wiktionary:Requests for deletion or Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others as appropriate.
The title of the deletion discussion should be left as the Wikified page name, which is automatically provided for you.
[edit] Talk
This page has been listed on Wiktionary:Requests for deletion.
Please see that page for justifications and discussion. Please do not remove this notice or blank this page while the question is being considered. However, you are welcome to make improvements to it. [[Category:Requests for deletion]]
I'd like to make the changes above. (Jump directly to section, make period the "add new section" link.) Any objections? --Connel MacKenzie 03:33, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
- Not from me. Give it a try. I'm not sure that the jump-to-section will work, though. Uncle G 11:17, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
- Seems to work fine for main-namespace articles. :-) Done. --Connel MacKenzie 03:11, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
I just noticed that the full stop / period at the end of the description is a hyperlink. I think this is a bit of a hack honestly. A more professional solution would be to have a small "non-hidden" link or if you don't want bad guys finding it, just keep the link in your favourites instead. — Hippietrail 7 July 2005 01:25 (UTC)
- It does seem kind of useless. Eclecticology July 7, 2005 02:46 (UTC)
Why is this protected? That's aggravating. 24 7 July 2005 02:51 (UTC)
[edit] lurl
I've replaced the "lurl" template by its contents to prevent the link to the template from appearing on every edit page with an rfd. It seems to be only recently that the edit pages started to pick up this link. Eclecticology 17:06, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've replaced lurl with the "correct" magic word fullurle: (slightly different syntax.) While here, I added lots of template comments and made the special link less obscure. --Connel MacKenzie T C 23:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Full power Why does it deserve to be deleted?
I see some crediblity from it (full power).