User talk:Foreverknowledge

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
• Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
• Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including, there is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
• The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
• We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Wiktionary:Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! --Ivan Štambuk 23:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Removing of Rekhta ref templates

I added the Rekhta refs after searching for the relevant words which 'were' present there. The ref is pretty relevant and gives the definition in the Devanagari script. Not sure why it would not be relevant just because it mentions itself as an "Urdu" dictionary. Both languages are extremely relevant to each other as are their refs. Urdu and Hindi are treated similarly here at Wiktionary and politicizing by removing refs just because they mention "Urdu" should not be done. Gotitbro (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Not sure why you're jumping to the conclusion that there's "politicizing". It just didn't make sense to use an Urdu dictionary for a Hindi Wiktionary reference, just like it wouldn't make sense to use it for the English Wiktionary articles on Jammu, Kashmir, or biryani. Seems more correct to use a dictionary reference for the language the dictionary pertains to. But your point about the interrelatedness is noted. --Foreverknowledge (talk) 10:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Question

why you removed the infos when "Hindi" page already had that info? Rihantel (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

ہندی

How term Hindi is not for Indian born Muslims? Rihantel (talk) 03:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

See Talk:Hindi Foreverknowledge (talk) 05:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

But, in Hobson dictionary, both Hindoo and Hindi terms were used in same sentence. So Both term were not to define geography, but religion.

So,

First is used to identify Indian race with Indian religions. Later is used to identify Indian race with the religion outside of India (Islam).

So in that view, Hindi means, Indian people of Muslim background. Rihantel (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

No it doesn’t, which is why the RFV failed. Hindoo was defined as “A person of Indian religion and race”, while Hindi was defined as “country born” (i.e. “Indian”) and doesn’t imply religion. So “The Musalmáns, who were Hindís” means “The Musalmáns, who were Indians”. Foreverknowledge (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)