Wiktionary:Votes/2010-04/Renaming requested entry pages 2

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

Renaming requested entry pages 2[edit]

  • Vote starts: 00:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 24:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC) - 14 days after the start

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support Thryduulf 11:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC). I'm not certain that this vote is necessary, but voting in support in case it is. Thryduulf 11:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support Dan Polansky 14:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC). I don't particularly care either way. I agree with this renaming for its consistency with the names of language-specific categories in Wiktionary: Category:Requests (Spanish), Category:Translation requests (Spanish), Category:Requests for etymology (Spanish), Category:Requests for audio pronunciation (Spanish), Category:Requests for pronunciation (Spanish), and Category:Tbot entries (Spanish). --Dan Polansky 14:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support EncycloPetey 00:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC) Although, I agree with msh210 that the vote passed (as I understood it). --EncycloPetey 00:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support also agree other vote passed, but we might as well document that consensus here by voting in support. --Bequw τ 02:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support Yair rand 17:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support Robert Ullmann 09:46, 30 April 2010 (UTC) although not really necessary as mentioned by others Robert Ullmann 09:46, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg SupportAugPi (t) 15:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support (and by the way it's my favorite option too) DAVilla 08:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Belated support. But not only was this vote unnecessary — the previous vote was unnecessary as well! —RuakhTALK 19:48, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

Abstain[edit]

  1. Symbol abstain vote.svg Per discussion at the bottom of the preceding vote, and on this vote's talkpage, we should not be voting on this. The vote passed, and that's all: there's no need for a second vote.​—msh210 17:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Decision[edit]

Passes.​—msh210 18:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)