I noticed that few administrators are involved in this page and it has even requests from 2007, so it is rarely used (or rather, rarely notified). May I move the page to
Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress/Point of view pushing, so that it attracts the attention more easily? The rationale for this proposal is that Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress lists it as a subpage. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 18:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
I, for one, wouldn't
mind such a move, I suppose, but don't see the point: how will it be more visible there than it is here? Perhaps we just need to remind interested parties (in the BP perhaps) that this page exists, and advise them to watchlist it. — msh210 18:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it would be nice. Does somebody consider an archive for
those settled disputes needful? The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
WT:VIP for this purpose nowadays. No point in keeping this as an inactive page or archive, per w:WP:DENY. — Μετάknowledge 21:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC) discuss/ deeds
Delete. Not per DENY, but because it’s better to centralise vandalism reports, instead of having a different page for this or that type of vandalism. — 22:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Ungoliant ( Falai)
Delete. And perhaps, afterward, recreate as redirect. Though I'm not sure if or WT:VIP would be the better redirect target. — WT:NPOV Ruakh 05:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Mglovesfun ( talk) 21:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)