Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/dwóh₁

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Would it be possible to add a declension table ? --Fsojic (talk) 17:31, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but I don't know what the declension would be. I can guess it would probably only have dual forms, but dual forms are notoriously hard to reconstruct in PIE. Can you find any sources about this? —CodeCat 17:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, can we ad this? --Teutoturukian (talk) 00:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Short *-o variant[edit]

Latin, Greek, and IIRC also Celtic dual forms point to a short *-o. Unfortunately, it's simply ignored here, and the Proto-Italic and Proto-Greek reconstructions are simply with long *-ō, with no attempt to account for the difference. What's going on here? --Florian Blaschke (talk) 14:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the cardinal boxes of PIE numbers[edit]

Should we improve the cardinal boxes for the numbers in PIE, in order to show more than the reconstructed cardinal number, because prefixes, ordinal, fractional etc. derived from these numbers have been reconstructed ? The purpose of the cardinal boxes is to show briefly and easily a maximum of information about a number in a language. Malku H₂n̥rés (talk) 18:44, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Reconstruction_talk:Proto-Indo-European/dwóh₁&oldid=59561524"