Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/médʰu

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

Is it cognate with *mélid ? --Fsojic (talk) 17:08, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Probably not. At least not at a level where we can figure it out with our current knowledge. —CodeCat 17:18, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for this answer ! --Fsojic (talk) 17:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Missing dash[edit]

This entry should have a dash at the end of it, denoting an unknown suffix. --Victar (talk) 16:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

But is the ending really unknown, or is it just no visible ending at all? There's a difference... neuter nouns have no ending for the nominative/accusative singular in PIE. So we'd have to confirm whether this was a masculine or neuter noun, since the descendants seem to be both. A masculine noun would be *médʰus, but a neuter one would be *médʰu with no ending. —CodeCat 17:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

More descendants[edit]

http://www.eki.ee/dict/ety/index.cgi?Q=mesi&F=M&C06=et

This page lists the following languages as descending from this root: Estonian Livonian Votic Finnish Izhorian Karelian Ludic Veps Erzya Mokša Mari? Udmurt Komi Hungarian

Might be a slightly later loan from Indo-Iranian.

It's indeed usually considered a pre-Indo-Iranian loan, which are probably best listed separately rather than under Indo-Iranian proper. Anyway, see now Proto-Uralic *mete (and also Proto-Finnic *meci) for more. --Tropylium (talk) 01:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
On this topic, we could add also Chinese among the descendants; Old Chinese *mit is usually considered a loan from Tocharian. --Tropylium (talk) 01:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)