Reconstruction talk:Proto-Semitic/Urušalimmi

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFDO discussion: September–November 2017[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


As the name of a city, there is no reason to believe this word existed in Proto-Semitic. More likely it was borrowed from the original language into other Semitic languages at a much later time. There is no agreement about when and where Proto-Semitic was spoken (or even about whether it ever existed as a single language in the first place), but regardless, it very likely predates any settlements in the Jerusalem area. --WikiTiki89 21:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless scholarly references can be found. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 00:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is the same idiot who added Old English and Gothic translations at television. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No it's a different guy I think. And this one is a much less drastic anachronism. --WikiTiki89 15:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. The IP I'm thinking of did edit that page a month after it was created, but wasn't the creator. No, this user has his/her own baggage to deal with, but playing time-travel fantasies with the dictionary isn't something they do. I still wouldn't trust their judgment on this, though. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]