Talk:оуньшиина
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV in topic RFV discussion
RFV discussion
[edit]
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
I'm not disputing the term itself but its spelling. The double и looks like it might be a mistake, especially as the head= parameter lacks it. Is anyone able to verify the correct spelling? —CodeCat 17:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- There is a reference in that entry for a reason [1]. The lemma form is a normalized spelling ignoring the typographical distinctions among the different symbols for /i/. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 18:18, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Since I can't read the reference, what does it say? Why did you initially create this with the head parameter not the same as the page name. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:12, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- It's a dictionary of OCS in Russian (also translations to Czech and Greek are given in the headwords). On the page 741, right column, the third headword from the top is the lemma as above. The number in the parentheses (1) indicates how much attestations does this word have - only one. Its entry also contains an excerpt from Codex Suprasliensis (abbreviated as Supr, in Cyrillic that would be Супр) where this word is used. In the quotation the second /i/ is written with a diaeresis, and the normalized lemma entry contains simply two ии letters. The headword was different because I accidentally a letter, due to the haste in which these entries were made. Anyway, the entry should be moved to оуньшиина (unĭšiina) per Unicode 5.1 (which was released after this entry was created..). --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Would you happen to know anything about the etymology of the word? —CodeCat 23:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- It's from ꙋнии (unii) which is listed on the previous page of the one linked above, with an attestation of ꙋньшє (unĭše) in Supr, which would presumably be a genitive form, onto whose stem -ina suffix was added. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 01:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- I've moved it to the form with
оуinstead ofѹ. —Angr 19:25, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- I've moved it to the form with
- It's from ꙋнии (unii) which is listed on the previous page of the one linked above, with an attestation of ꙋньшє (unĭše) in Supr, which would presumably be a genitive form, onto whose stem -ina suffix was added. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 01:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Would you happen to know anything about the etymology of the word? —CodeCat 23:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- It's a dictionary of OCS in Russian (also translations to Czech and Greek are given in the headwords). On the page 741, right column, the third headword from the top is the lemma as above. The number in the parentheses (1) indicates how much attestations does this word have - only one. Its entry also contains an excerpt from Codex Suprasliensis (abbreviated as Supr, in Cyrillic that would be Супр) where this word is used. In the quotation the second /i/ is written with a diaeresis, and the normalized lemma entry contains simply two ии letters. The headword was different because I accidentally a letter, due to the haste in which these entries were made. Anyway, the entry should be moved to оуньшиина (unĭšiina) per Unicode 5.1 (which was released after this entry was created..). --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Since I can't read the reference, what does it say? Why did you initially create this with the head parameter not the same as the page name. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:12, 14 July 2013 (UTC)