Talk:темя

@Atitarev, Cinemantique, Wikitiki89, Wanjuscha, KoreanQuoter @Wikitiki: The lack of genitive plural is as indicated in Zaliznyak. But I agree that in cases where the plural is "conjectural or disused" it would be better to just not include it, and delete the corresponding non-lemma forms. Benwing2 (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Maybe we could have a mode that would display hypothetical forms with an asterisk and without linking, similar to what ru.wikt does? As for the genitive plural, I think that as long as it is a predictable form, we can include it in conjectural cases, unless there is a semantic reason for it to be missing. --WikiTiki89 14:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Sounds OK for me. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 00:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

This is something I've been meaning to do for awhile, I'll try to get to it soon. Benwing2 (talk) 01:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)