Talk:ピチャンチャチャラ語

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Deletion discussion[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

ピチャンチャチャラ語[edit]

The old entry was deleted, but this one seems almost as tenuous. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is BGC? And I don’t understand your request this time. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 01:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
books.google.com, Google Books. The abbreviation confused me, too, when I first saw it many months ago. - -sche (discuss) 02:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, Google Books. The hit count doesn’t matter, because ピチャンチャチャラ語 is the name used in Gengogaku Daijiten: [1]. I said it’s well attested. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 06:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That dictionary is entirely unhelpful, as far as I can tell with my lack of Japanese knowledge (I keep seeing 语 and thinking yǔ, then realizing that I need to switch to my almost nonexistent knowledge of Japanese. go, I believe.). If you do not know what citing an entry entails, please read WT:ATTEST. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 07:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It sais: “Attested” means verified through: […] 2. use in a well-known work, […]. Well, Gengogaku Daijiten is a well-known encyclopedia on linguistics you can easily find at local libraries in Japan. That should be enough. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 08:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, that's really stretching "well-known work". That's meant for Shakespeare and the like. Secondly, does Gengogaku Daijiten even use the word, as opposed to mentioning it? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No citations in the entry used the term, and I share MK's doubts about counting a reference work as a "well-known work". It seems that by that argument, any word the OED used in a definiens could be included... :/
I have tentatively deleted the entry. - -sche (discuss) 20:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's only one cite out of three needed, but it's a start. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 21:37, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:ピチャンチャチャラ語&oldid=31631365"