Talk:協神星

RFV discussion: April–June 2022

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

協神星

# {{lb|zh|astronomy}} {{w|58 Concordia}}

@Theknightwho —Fish bowl (talk) 00:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Attested in officially approved national standard glossary of astronomy terms. --H₂NCH₂COOH (Talk) 04:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Actually this website cites two sources, and one of them is publicly accessiblen. There is also another source from Taiwan (in 2018天文常數 PDF file). --H₂NCH₂COOH (Talk) 06:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

@H2NCH2COOH: Please read WT:ATTEST. I would think these are more like mentions rather than uses. Being in an approved glossary doesn't mean it can be an entry here. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 07:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Inclusion in an officially approved national standard surely goes above and beyond a mere mention, no? It's generally considered enough for inclusion in Unicode (where that applies). Theknightwho (talk) 11:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

@Theknightwho: Sorry for the late reply. We are not Unicode. Simply appearing in the list doesn't count as a use (see WT:ATTEST, "Conveying meaning"). — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 22:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

• RFV failed. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 23:00, 5 June 2022 (UTC)