Talk:Beltway
RFD debate[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Attributive noun, not a true adjective. DAVilla 15:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Do you think (deprecated template usage) go is an acceptable substitute for "become" in one of the CGEL adjectivity tests? I think it is, and desirable for including current usage. I've added one cite as an example so far. DCDuring TALK 17:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that any one adjective test is met by three cites, but one can find instances of meeting each. DCDuring TALK 18:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- One of the posted cites is "Nothing more Beltway than that" which could well be using it as a proper noun.—msh210℠ (talk) 18:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Withdrawn. DAVilla 18:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
RFV debate[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
RFV-sense "Washington D.C." Tagged but not listed. - -sche (discuss) 03:41, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Also I'm dubious that the adjective exists in a comparative sense. "Most Beltway" doesn't sound like something anyone would say. Happerslaffer (talk)
- As to comparative form: 2 from Google Books. DCDuring TALK 01:52, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 00:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)