Talk:Mapudungun alphabet
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Seems like a simple sum of parts. "Mapudungun alphabet" just means the alphabet of the Mapudungun language (despite the fact that multiple possibilities exist). Dominic·t 21:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- I would never figure out what this article describes just by looking up the individual words. Concise and informative, keep. —Stephen 23:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, based on the fact that there is currently no one "Mapudungun alphabet", and on my assumption that someone is more likely to search for that term than Raguileo alphabet, Unified alphabet or Azümchefe alphabet. Maybe not main-namespace appropriate, but not something that should just be deleted. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 01:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete or RFV, since I don't think it will pass there. The only Books result is this crappy speculative one: "There are three proposals for a Mapudungun alphabet". Equinox ◑ 11:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete "based on the fact that there is currently no one 'Mapudungun alphabet'", so this is SoP, meaning any Mapudungun alphabet. I would "figure out what this article describes just by looking up the individual words", since Equinox' cite uses the indefinite article, so I know from context that this is not the name of an alphabet. More, even if some cite uses the definite article, so context does not give away that the meaning is "some alphabet for Mapudungun", since the author actually means a certain one, our entry doesn't help, since it doesn't specify which one.—msh210℠ 17:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. —RuakhTALK 01:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sum of parts. The alphabet of the Mapudungun language. The fact that there isn't one is encyclopedic. We don't have temperatures below absolute zero either. Delete. DAVilla 12:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Move to Appendix. --EncycloPetey 15:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Moved to Appendix:Mapudungun alphabet. --Jackofclubs 00:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)