Talk:arm hair

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

arm hair

Resembles others by this contributor. Not in any dictionary at “armhair”, in OneLook Dictionary Search.. WP has a redirect to w:Androgenic hair. DCDuring TALK 00:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

But... what's the deletion logic? Mglovesfun (talk) 00:08, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

SoP. Meaning is per normal construction of noun-noun noun phrases. DCDuring TALK 00:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Keep per WT:COALMINE. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Someone should double check that the citations in the ineptly-formatted [[armhair]] entry aren't just as wrong/misleading as the citations in the head-, neck-, leg- and bodyhair entries which are currently being re-RFVed. - -sche (discuss) 12:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry. The citations at armhair seem correct, though they do not support their placement under the sense plural of armhair. DCDuring TALK 13:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Actually two of the three are good. The third work contains one instance each of armhair and arm hair, suggesting that the generally much less common form, armhair, is an error. I was rendered cranky and careless by confrontation with contributions made during a user's piliphiliac (unattestable, I think) episode. DCDuring TALK 13:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

armhair failed RFV; this fails RFD. I have deleted both entries. - -sche (discuss) 07:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)