Talk:artfull
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RFV discussion[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: Common misspelling of artful. How common is it? Mglovesfun (talk) 15:06, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- B.g.c. gives 1,420,000 results for "artful" but only 174 for "artfull", making (deprecated template usage) artfull <1.23‱ as common as (deprecated template usage) artful, or about two hundred times rarer than the most inclusive of minimum proportional thresholds (~2–3%). Moreover, besides the fact that it is too rare for inclusion as any kind of common misspelling, listing (deprecated template usage) artfull both as a legitimate obsolete spelling and as a misspelling is redundant. So, for reasons of clocking-out, rarity, and redundancy, I declare this RFV failed. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 20:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC)