Talk:er voor spek en bonen bijstaan

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: April–September 2017[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


See above, voor spek en bonen + bijstaan. — Kleio (t · c) 18:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, should entries like geen kind hebben aan and geen boodschap hebben aan be with or without the aan? — Kleio (t · c) 18:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Can they ever be used without? —CodeCat 18:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's sometimes used with voor as well, though aan is more common (by far). Saying it without either does sound unnatural. — Kleio (t · c) 18:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I guess one could be called an alternative form of another, but I'm not sure what the usual practice is. Ask in BP maybe? —CodeCat 18:50, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would include the aan and mention an alternative form if required. voor doesn't sound too natural to me either, so I'm not adding it. W3ird N3rd (talk) 22:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]