Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

RFV discussion: July 2011–February 2012[edit]

TK archive icon.svg

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

Another Pynchon invention. Nadando 20:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

  • The word is ‘valid’ in the sense of formed according to existing bases. Anyway, I've copied the quote to the gonio- page, since I doubt there are three citations of this. Ƿidsiþ 16:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Can't it pass by being a nonce word in a well-known work? Pynchon is important. Equinox 14:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Tagged and kept for now. - -sche (discuss) 03:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

RFV 2[edit]

Keep tidy.svg

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

I couldn't find anything on Google Books or Usenet besides the one citation in the entry. Google Scholar does have one paper by M Cornis-Pope, but it just quotes Pynchon: "To the Cartesian sense of spacial order (the “Ortholatry” and “Goniolatry” of classical surveying), Captain Shelby opposes a metamorphic “polygony” defined “by as many of these exhilarating Instrumental Sweeps, as possible”". - -sche (discuss) 09:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

RFV-failed; moved to Appendix:English nonces. - -sche (discuss) 03:06, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Archiver note: previously, this met WT:ATTEST and thus would not have failed RFV; things changed in Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-03/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work 3. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:10, 21 March 2015 (UTC)