Talk:idiosyncratic usage
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wikipedia Edit History[edit]
This page was m:Transwikied from Wikipedia. Below is the edit history for the Wikipedia article.
- Time: 2004-02-17T10:52:31Z - By: w:User:158.37.155.149
- Time: 2004-03-09T23:08:11Z - By: w:User:Sashal - Comment: stub
- Time: 2004-03-09T23:13:37Z - By: w:User:Nunh-huh - Comment: change silly definition to unsilly definition
- Time: 2004-05-21T19:44:47Z - By: w:User:SimonP
- Time: 2004-07-15T15:33:32Z - By: w:User:Merovingian - Comment: -msg, apostrophes > quotes
- Time: 2004-07-15T15:34:08Z - By: w:User:Merovingian - Comment: cat
- Time: 2004-12-17T08:45:07Z - By: w:User:Somebody in the WWW - Comment: {{move to Wiktionary}}
- Time: 2005-01-26T20:13:39Z - By: w:User:Szyslak - Comment: Changed stub tag
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
It's usage that's idiosyncratic. -- Prince Kassad 19:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, yes, a good old fashioned SoP transwiki from Wikipedia where they should have just shot the thing on sight. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't see a useful idiom lurking in this. DCDuring TALK 00:23, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sum of parts. Delete. Tempodivalse [talk] 18:45, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. --Mglovesfun (talk) 10:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)