Talk:queen knight pawn
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Oddly, BGC will only turn up hits for "queen's knight's pawn" when I search this, even in quotes. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 02:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- There are hits also for "queen knight pawn" if you filter out the apostrophe versions: [1] --Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- It should be renamed to queen's knight's pawn, which is much more common anyway. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:47, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
king bishop pawn[edit]
- Deleted. Queen bishop pawn still exists; it seems to be attested, though less common than the "'s" version; is it SOP? - -sche (discuss) 03:36, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Some of the terms at w:Glossary of chess are SoP if one accepts the chess-specific way chess terms combine as part of how English nouns combine to form NPs. But this class, being small, seems more suitable for lexical treatment than clock times (minutes), numbers (multi-digit), or chemical formulas (all but the most common, like H2O. DCDuring TALK 14:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)