The mathematical definition is definitley too restricted (it's basically the definition of a vector space)- I'm wondering if a modification of the definition given in wp wouldn't be better: "a set, with some particular properties and usually some additional structure; the exact formulation of which depends on the space in question" \Mike 10:20, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The wording of some of the definitions does not communicate meaning well, especially in the absence of usage examples, usage contexts, or citations. Some of the definitions seem to be attempting some kind of technical accuracy, but achieve it only at the expense of intelligibility. I have made some changes, but more is needed. A tip of the hat to the anon who commented at Wiktionary:Feedback#space. DCDuring TALK 03:38, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have had a go at sense#5. It was,
- and is now,
- In my opinion, sense#6 is the same meaning and should be combined. It is tne technical definition used by NASA, but refers to the same thing. Or even removed as encyclopaedic.
- I have also amended sense#1 which was,
- and is now,
- However, my definition is clearly not uncountable, as originally stated, so I might be missing something here.
- The geometry sense also needs some work. SpinningSpark 11:14, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sense#4 and sense#13 also seem to be identical. SpinningSpark 11:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Lots of work has been done on this one, and I'm going to call it closed now. (I did my best to match up the old translation tables to the newly-defined senses; hopefully not too much got lost in transfer.) Ƿidsiþ 08:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)