Template talk:alteration
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
It would be easier to just type it out manually. Not that it's at all clear what it means in its current transclusions anyway. —CodeCat 23:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Atitarev, Cinemantique, Wikitiki89, Wanjuscha, KoreanQuoter I agree. I don't see the point of it, and it's being used to format etymologies in a way that's inconsistent with longstanding practice. Comments from other Russian editors? Benwing2 (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, D1gggg seems to be obsessed with creating templates for things that can't just be spelled out. --WikiTiki89 19:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- D1g seems slavishly devoted to that one grammar book. Anything not listed in it gets tagged as "unlisted", etc. Anyway, deleted. - -sche (discuss) 05:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, D1gggg seems to be obsessed with creating templates for things that can't just be spelled out. --WikiTiki89 19:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Pointless deletion[edit]
@-sche, Rua, Benwing, Wikitiki89
You need competence to claim that alterations are not present in Russian lemmas.
Even most useless resources get it: