Template talk:etyl:poz-bop

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search
Green check.svg

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

This is a paraphyletic grouping according to Wikipedia, so it's not a true language family and has no unique common ancestor. —CodeCat 17:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm assuming that you'll kill the category and all the transclusions as well? --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 14:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
I think that changing the Superfamily subtemplate on {{etyl:phi}} should take care of most of them. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
The category can probably stay as long as it's made clear in the description and in the way it's categorised that it's just a convenient collection of languages, not a linguistic family. —CodeCat 15:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
The category can't exist without the template though. -- Liliana 16:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
We can type the contents out manually can't we? —CodeCat 16:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
But the categorization would not work. -- Liliana 18:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep per Liliana. The Austronesian and Australian languages are special cases: there are so many of them that we must, practically speaking, use some paraphyletic groupings to sort them. (I used to RFD such groupings myself, but I have since come to see the impossibility of sorting the Austr. languages without them.) - -sche (discuss) 18:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)