Removal of certain Middle Dutch variations

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Rua
Jump to navigation Jump to search

When they're just spelling variants, they only clutter up the list and add nothing. When they are real variants, I suppose the same argument can be made, though not as convincingly. In any case, I'd rather keep the descendants lists clean if possible, and list alternative forms in the entries themselves.

CodeCat22:01, 20 May 2017

I disagree as well. I think all variant, perhaps short of spelling errors, should be kept and added to {{alter}}.

Victar (talk)01:59, 26 May 2017

Only alternative forms, not alternative spellings, and only the more common alternative forms should be listed as descendants, not the really obscure ones. It clutters up the list too much.

CodeCat02:01, 26 May 2017

I can conceded that obscure forms should generally be omitted, but I think a) in a period of fluctuating spelling, who's to say which is most correct, and b) making the distinction between a spelling variant and a alternative form can be blurry, and c) spelling variants can illustrate archaic forms echoing the ODut form, or the transition and standardization of MDut to ModDut.

Victar (talk)02:47, 26 May 2017

Middle Dutch spelling is normalized per WT:ADUM. The normalisation affects only things that we know are just different ways that the same thing is spelled.

CodeCat12:41, 26 May 2017

I'll wait for @3liot to reply, as I've said my peace.

Victar (talk)15:32, 26 May 2017