Wiktionary:Votes/2010-04/Renaming requested entry pages 2

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

Renaming requested entry pages 2[edit]

  • Vote starts: 00:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 24:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC) - 14 days after the start


  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support Thryduulf 11:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC). I'm not certain that this vote is necessary, but voting in support in case it is. Thryduulf 11:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support Dan Polansky 14:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC). I don't particularly care either way. I agree with this renaming for its consistency with the names of language-specific categories in Wiktionary: Category:Requests (Spanish), Category:Translation requests (Spanish), Category:Requests for etymology (Spanish), Category:Requests for audio pronunciation (Spanish), Category:Requests for pronunciation (Spanish), and Category:Tbot entries (Spanish). --Dan Polansky 14:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support EncycloPetey 00:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC) Although, I agree with msh210 that the vote passed (as I understood it). --EncycloPetey 00:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support also agree other vote passed, but we might as well document that consensus here by voting in support. --Bequw τ 02:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support Yair rand 17:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support Robert Ullmann 09:46, 30 April 2010 (UTC) although not really necessary as mentioned by others Robert Ullmann 09:46, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg SupportAugPi (t) 15:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support (and by the way it's my favorite option too) DAVilla 08:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Belated support. But not only was this vote unnecessary — the previous vote was unnecessary as well! —RuakhTALK 19:48, 12 May 2010 (UTC)



  1. Symbol abstain vote.svg Per discussion at the bottom of the preceding vote, and on this vote's talkpage, we should not be voting on this. The vote passed, and that's all: there's no need for a second vote.​—msh210 17:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


Passes.​—msh210 18:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)